Part 13 Answering objections: Colossians 1:15 and Revelations 3:14

Here are more passages Jehovah’s Witnesses use to refute the Trinity.  (Refer to parts 10 11, & 12 for more verses)

  • Colossians 1:15 “He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.”

PROBLEM: Jehovah’s Witnesses claim Jesus was God’s “firstborn” or “first-created.”  They point out the firstborn child to Pharaoh refers to birth order.  In the same way Jesus is the firstborn or first-created of Jehovah.

SOLUTION:  The Greek word used in Colossians 1:15 is “prototokos” which can mean birth order, first in rank, preeminent one, or heir.  So how do we know which definition is the best?  We can study the context of the passage.  Colossians 1:15-17 He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation.  16 For by Him all things were created, both in the heavens and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities—all things have been created through Him and for Him. 17 He is before all things, and in Him all things hold together.”  The definition “preeminent one” makes the most sense since verses 16 and17 say he was the creator of everything and all things were created for Him.  Jesus cannot be created if He is the creator; He cannot create Himself.

Jehovah’s Witnesses still want to strongly assert the best definition is birth order in spite of the context of the passage.  They say Pharaoh’s first born indicates birth order and it should be applied here.  However, David was called firstborn in Psalm 89:27 and yet he was the youngest of seven brothers.  In Psalm 89 he was the preeminent one or heir of God’s promise.  The Messiah would come from the line of David.  In addition firstborn was used when speaking of the priority of Israel in Exodus 4:22 (Israel my firstborn son).  Again this doesn’t have anything to do with birth order.  In addition when Paul uses firstborn he does not mean “first-created.”   Jehovah’s Witnesses don’t believe Jesus was born in a human sense but that He is a created being.  In the Greek the word for “first-created” is protoktisis.  Paul avoided this term because he was not teaching that Jesus was a created being.  The verses that follow strongly support Jesus as the uncreated creator.

In an attempt to bolster their case and change the context of the verses that follow verse 15, the New World Translation [NWT] added the word “other” four times.  This was done to avoid calling Jesus the preeminent one, the uncreated creator.  The word “other” was added in brackets in the NWT because it is not in the original.  In verses 16 -17 the NWT writes, “…because by means of him all [other] things were created in the heavens and upon the earth, the things visible and the things invisible, no matter whether they are thrones or lordships or governments or authorities. All [other] things have been created through him and for him. 17 Also, he is before all [other] things and by means of him all [other] things were made to exist.”  The word [other] was added to deny that Jesus created everything.  Any word additions to the Bible that change the meaning of the text violate the rules of interpretation and in this case are heretical.  The word [other] is not in the Greek manuscripts according to their own textbook called the “Kingdom Interlinear Translation of the Greek Scriptures.”  They claim it helps clarify the verses.  However, it actually changes what Paul intended.  Words cannot be added if they change the meaning of the passage.  Luke 13:2 is an example of where “other” is added in many translations but doesn’t change the meaning of the passage.  This is an acceptable practice.

Rev. 3:14 “…The Amen, the faithful and true Witness, the Beginning of the creation of God, “

PROBLEM:  Jehovah’s Witnesses use this verse to show that Jesus is a created being.  They say he is the “beginning of the creation of God.”  For them this means he was the first thing God created.

SOLUTION:  The Greek word for beginning is “arche” which can mean, one who begins, origin, source, creator, first cause, or ruler.  As usual context determines the meaning.  I believe the best definition is “first cause.”   This makes Jesus the active beginning of the creation, the one who caused creation.  The English word architect is derived from “arche.”  Jesus functions as the architect of all creation.  This definition can be supported in John 1:3, Col. 1:16, & Heb. 1:2.  Some translations use the word “ruler” over all creation.  Jesus as the ruler also works according to the context.

The Greek word “arche” is used of Jehovah (God) as the beginning and the end in Revelations 1:17, 21:6, & 22:13 (see also Isa. 44:6 & 48:12).  For Jehovah’s Witnesses to be consistent they have to say if “arche” means Jesus was created then the same word used three other times in Revelations for Jehovah should be interpreted as He was created.  However, they will never accept that Jehovah was created.

In addition John 1:3 & Colossians 1:16 say Jesus is the uncreated creator.  If He created “all things” he cannot create Himself.  To say Jesus was created would contradict those verses.    

Go to part 14 here

Enhanced by Zemanta
{ 3 comments… add one }
  • Ben Burns March 17, 2024, 10:55 pm

    The Greek word “prototokos” means “first brought forth” it NEVER means preeminent, although a “first brought forth” my hold the position of being preeminent. In every instances where “prototokos” is used in the Bible, the “prototokos” is ALWAYS A MEMBER of the the group that they are the “prototokos” of. That applies to David even though he was not the first born wa made first born, he still belong to the group called kings – “The highest of the kings of the earth”. Jesus is a member of the group called creation.

    It is true that arche can mean chief in some contexts, but by the grammatical, genitive construction of this verse, Revelation 3:14 teaches that Jesus is the beginning, or start, of the group called creation. Grammatically and linguistically the verse can mean nothing else. Jesus is a member of the group called creation.

  • Steve Bruecker March 19, 2024, 10:50 am

    Ben,
    Thanks for your email. My first reply will deal only with Colossians 1:15. I immediately noticed your comments about Colossians 1:15 were 100% your opinion. Why should I take anything you say seriously? Please quote your sources for your comments. My reply will use a variety of widely accepted scholars. This is a small sampling of Biblical scholars who refute your position.

    First, I begin with a Greek dictionary: Vine’s Complete Expository Dictionary of Old and New Testament Words: FIRST-BEGOTTEN, FIRSTBORN

    Prototokos (πρωτοτόκος, 4416), “firstborn” (from protos, “first,” and tikto, “to beget”), is used of Christ as born of the Virgin Mary, Luke 2:7; further, in His relationship to the Father, expressing His priority to, and preeminence over, creation, not in the sense of being the “first” to be born.

    Theological Dictionary of the New Testament: In Col. 1:15 the “for” clause brings out the meaning, namely, that all things owe their creation to Christ’s mediation. The point, then, is not that Christ is the first creature. This would demand a stress on the -tokos and would also bring birth into conflict with creation. What is stated is Christ’s supremacy over creation as its mediator. The term prōtótokos is used, then, because of its importance as a word for rank. In spite of v. 4 it does not here denote Christ’s special relation to the Father. The twofold use does not necessarily derive from Gnostic ideas of the primal man or the redeemed redeemer. As the mediator of the first creation, Christ is also the mediator of the new creation with his resurrection from the dead (v. 18).

    Rob Bowman (Why You Should Believe in the Trinity): Jehovah’s Witnesses point out that the parallel expressions “firstborn of Pharaoh,” “firstborn of Israel,” and so on, are always used to mean the first one born in that group, so that “firstborn all creation” must mean the first one created. To be more exact, however, what these expressions mean is the first child of the one named – thus, the firstborn of Pharaoh is Pharaoh’s first son: The firstborn of Israel is Israel’s first son, and so on. If the expression “firstborn of all creation’ is held to be parallel to these phrases, it would mean the first one (or offspring) of all creation. However, this would be the exact opposite of what the text actually says, which is that all creation came into existence through Christ (Col. 1:16). Creation did not produce Christ; Christ produced creation! Therefore, since the meaning of “first child” will not fit the context, the meaning of “heir” must be understood. Only this interpretation makes sense of the text, which then means Christ is the heir of creation because all things were made through him and for him.

    Lightfoot Saint Paul’s Epistles to Philemon and Colossians: He lists the Fathers who support this view and says, “All the [early church] fathers of the 2nd and 3rd centuries without exception, so far as I have noticed, correctly refer it to the Eternal Word and not to the Incarnate Christ, to the Deity and not to the humanity of our Lord.” It was only after the Arians latched onto this verse to attempt to teach their doctrines that the Church leaders began to change their exegesis of this passage.

    We have seen that the use of prototokos in the Septuagint, the New Testament, and later Patristic writings refers to 1) the firstborn, as in Luke 2:7, and 2) (Col. 1:15) the one who is pre-eminent and sovereign, always in relation to the Lord Jesus Christ. Truly, the Lord of Glory is the Sovereign of all the Universe, the Firstborn of all Creation (Lightfoot).

    Biblical Worldview Academy: (You skipped this) In addition, when Paul uses firstborn, he does not mean “first-created.” Jehovah’s Witnesses don’t believe Jesus was born in a human sense but that He is a created being. In Greek, the word for “first-created” is protoktisis. Paul avoided this term because he was not teaching that Jesus was a created being. The verses that follow strongly support Jesus as the uncreated creator.

    Biblical Worldview Academy: (You skipped this) In an attempt to bolster their [Jehovah’s Witnesses] case and change the context of the verses that follow verse 15, the New World Translation [NWT] added the word “other” four times. This was done to avoid calling Jesus the preeminent one, the uncreated creator. In verses 16 -17 the NWT writes, “…because by means of him all [other] things were created in the heavens and upon the earth, the things visible and the things invisible, no matter whether they are thrones or lordships or governments or authorities. All [other] things have been created through him and for him. 17 Also, he is before all [other] things and by means of him all [other] things were made to exist.” The word [other] was added to deny that Jesus created everything. Any word additions to the Bible that change the meaning of the text violate the rules of interpretation and in this case are heretical. The word [other] is not in the Greek manuscripts according to their own textbook called the “Kingdom Interlinear Translation of the Greek Scriptures.” They claim it helps clarify the verses. However, it actually changes what Paul intended. Words cannot be added if they change the meaning of the passage. Luke 13:2 is an example of where “other” is added in many translations but doesn’t change the meaning of the passage. This is an acceptable practice.

    Steve Bruecker

  • Steve Bruecker March 20, 2024, 7:57 am

    Ben,
    The following is my second email (See my previous reply about Colossians 1:15), this time addressing your comments on Revelations 3:14. As you did in your comments on both passages, you only express your opinion and fail to cite scholarly resources. What are your resources?

    In context, this is one of a series of letters as Jesus addresses seven churches. These verses deal with the church at Laodicea. Revelations 3:14: “And to the angel of the church in Laodicea write: ‘The words of the Amen, the faithful and true witness, the beginning of God’s creation.

    As my previous email states, much has been written Revelations 3:14 that directly contradicts your position.

    New American Standard Hebrew-Aramaic and Greek Dictionaries
    ἀρχή archē; from 757; beginning, origin:—beginning(38), corners(2), domain(1), elementary(1), elementary*(1), first(1), first preaching(1), principalities(1), rule(4), rulers(6).

    Vine’s Complete Expository Dictionary of Old and New Testament Words:
    arche (ἀρχή, 746) means “a beginning.” The root arch primarily indicated what was of worth. Hence the verb archo meant “to be first,” and archon denoted “a ruler.” So also arose the idea of “a beginning,” the origin, the active cause, whether a person or thing, e.g., Col. 1:18.

    Rob Bowman (Why You Should Believe in the Trinity): The main argument presented by the JW booklet (Should Believe in the Trinity) for taking the “beginning of the creation” in the sense of “first creation is that John (the author of the Book of Revelation) always uses arche “with the common meaning of ‘beginning.’” However, if by “beginning” one understands ‘first thing,” this is not so. In fact, it has this meaning only once in John’s writings (John 2:11). Elsewhere in John’s Gospel and Epistles, it always refers to a beginning point in time (John 11:1, 2; 6:64; 8:25, 44; 15:27; 16:4; 1 John 1:1; 2:7, 13, 14, 24; 3:8, 11; 2 John 5, 6), not the first thing in a series.

    In the Book of Revelation, in fact, arche is used only three other times, and always of God as “the beginning and the end” (Rev. 1:8; 21:6; 22:13). Yet Witnesses will rightly deny that God is a first thing in a series of other things.

    Bruce Metzger (The Jehovah’s Witnesses and Jesus Christ): The New World Translation, in harmony with its bold twisting of Colossians 1:15-17, is also in error at Rev. 3:14, where it makes the exalted Christ refer to himself as “the beginning of the creation by God.” The Greek text of this verse (ὁ ἀρχή ὁ κτίσις ὁ θεός) is far from saying that Christ was created by God, for the genitive case, ὁ θεός means “of God and not “by God” (which would require the preposition ἐν). Actually, the word arche, translated “beginning,” carries with it the Pauline ideas expressed in Colossians 1:15-18 and signifies that Christ is the origin, or primary source, of God’s creation (compare with John 1:3, “Apart from him not even one thing came into existence”).

    Ron Rhodes (Reasoning from the Scriptures with Jehovah’s Witnesses): In responding to the Watchtower’s interpretation of Revelation 3:14, it is critical to note that there is a wide range of meanings for the Greek word arc he, which is translated “beginning” in the New World Translation. Though arche can mean “beginning,” the word is truly unique and also carries the important active meaning of “one who begins,” “origin,” “source,” “creator,” or “first cause.” Evangelical scholars agree that this is the intended meaning of the word in Revelation 3:14. The authoritative Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature by William Arndt and F. Wilbur Gingrich says the meaning of arche in Revelation 3:14 is “first cause.” Indeed, in Revelation 3:14, arche is used to refer to “the active beginning of the creation, the One who caused the creation, referring to Jesus Christ not as a created being, but the One who created all things (John I :3).”

    Based on our study of the scriptural context, I believe that arche in Revelation 3:14 carries the primary meaning of “beginner,” “first cause,” or “originator” of God’s creation. And a second possible meaning is that Christ is the “ruler” over God’s creation. It may be that in the case of Christ, both senses are intended inasmuch as Christ is elsewhere portrayed in Scripture as both the Creator (Hebrews 1:2) and Ruler (Revelation 19:16) of all things.

    The interpretation that Christ is the “beginner” of God’s creation harmonizes with other New Testament passages about Christ as Creator-whereas the Watchtower interpretation simply doesn’t fit the whole of Scripture. For example:
    • “For by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together” (Colossians 1:16,17).
    • “But in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe” (Hebrews 1:2).
    • “Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made” (John 1:3).

    Did you know that the same John who wrote Revelation 3:14 wrote John 1:3-“Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made”?

    Since the use of arche with God Almighty does not mean that He had a created beginning (Revelation 1:8; 21:6; 22:13), why go against John’s usage in Revelation and insist that when used of Christ the word arche indicates a created beginning?

    Steve Bruecker

Leave a Comment

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.

Next post:

Previous post:

Do Objective Morals Exist?
Answering Tough Questions
Counting the Cost
Is God the Author of the Bible?
God’s Holiness and Love Wins
Ministering to Mormons in Utah
Challenging a Jehovah’s Witness
What Ever Happened to Hell?
Accurately Interpreting the Scriptures
Understanding the Christian Worldview
Accused of Partnering in Wickedness
Set Apart Christ as Lord
Sharing with Knowledge & Wisdom
Becoming a Good Ambassador for Christ
How to Persuade Others

Video Introduction

Exposing the Deceit of the Watchtower Organization
Go to Site Map
About Us | Statement of Faith | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Site Map