Major Problems with the New World Translation

Pocket edition of the New World Translation of...

The Jehovah Witnesses love to knock on your door and promote their New World Translation (NWT) as the best Bible available to read and study.  A few months back I responded to a question concerning the NWT and decided to post my answer.

Dear Steve,

The New World Translation used by Jehovah Witnesses comes from the actual “Dead Sea Scrolls” that were written in Hebrew. It contains exact scriptures (in English) and puts God’s name back in the Bible over 7,000 times where it is supposed to be. That is the only difference in their Bible. Why do the newer versions of the King James Bible leave out God’s name? Psalm 83:18 clearly says his name is Jehovah. Other scriptures are Exodus 6:3, Isaiah 12:2, Isaiah 26:4, Genesis 22:14, Exodus 17:15, and Judges 6:24.  In the newer King James versions, his name is taken completely out.  In my opinion to truly know someone it starts with knowing their name. How can you truly know someone if you don’t even know what their name is? Therefore, would you want to use a Bible that leaves God’s name out, or would you want to use one that sanctifies it? The choice is yours.


Dear Angela,
Thanks for writing and giving your view. I will begin by correcting a few obvious errors in your comments. First, your translation does not come directly from the “Dead Sea Scrolls.” The primary source material for the Old Testament in the NWT was Kittel’s Biblia Hebracia. This edition first appeared in 1906. Multiple secondary sources were used including the Dead Sea Scrolls.

The New Testament for the NWT was taken from the Westcott and Hort manuscripts. I have a Kingdom Interlinear Translation of the Greek Scriptures published by your organization and it admits Westcott and Hort were the primary New Testament text utilized. These manuscripts are accepted as valid texts for the New Testament. The problem is not the original New Testament texts; the problem is how the Greek in the NWT was translated into English and how words were added that were never in the original text.

Second, Jehovah is not a Biblical word. It was created by combining the original Hebrew name for God YHWH and adonai (word used by Jews who didn’t want to say God’s name). The resulting combined word, “Jehovah” has been used for the name God by many groups but it is not found in the Bible. Nowhere do you find the word Jehovah in the original languages, Hebrew or Greek.

Third, forcing the word Jehovah into the New Testament is simply wrong. When your translators did this they went against thousands of Greek manuscripts of the New Testament; some of which date back to the second century. Instead the New Testament uses the words “Lord” [Greek: Kurios] and “God” [Greek: theos] when talking about God. The writers never used Jehovah, even when quoting the Old Testament. The Greek New Testament source for the New World Translation, Westcott and Hort, never used Jehovah. They used kurios for Lord and theos for God. The Kingdom Interlinear confirms Jehovah was never in the original text. This interlinear published by the Watchtower Organization shows how kurios (Lord) and theos (God) were changed to Jehovah in the English translation. Stating God’s name was left out of the King James or any other version of the Bible is false. Angela, I suggest finding a Kingdom Interlinear at your hall so you can see for yourself.  When your organization says they removed the name, they are lying to you.

Finally, let me address additional problems with the New World Translation. When it comes to this translation we find it almost universally rejected by noted scholars in the field of Biblical translations. Dr. Ron Rhodes, who wrote “Reasoning from the Scriptures with the Jehovah Witnesses,” stated:

“The New World translation is an incredibly biased translation. Dr. Robert Countess, who wrote a doctoral dissertation on the Greek text of the New World translation, concluded the translation ‘has been sharply unsuccessful in keeping doctrinal considerations from influencing the actual translation…It must be viewed as a radically biased piece of work. At some points it is actually dishonest. At others it is neither modern nor scholarly.’ British scholar H.H. Rowley asserted, ‘from the beginning to end this volume is a shining example of how the Bible should not be translated.’ Indeed, Rowley said, this translation is ‘an insult to the Word of God.’”

Dr. Julius Manti, author of A Manual Grammar of the Greek New Testament, calls the New World translation “a shocking mistranslation.” Dr. Bruce M. Metzger, professor of New Testament at Princeton University, calls the New World translation “a frightful mistranslation,” “erroneous,” “pernicious,” and “reprehensible.” Dr. William Barclay concluded that “the deliberate distortion of truth by this sect is seen in their New Testament translation. It is abundantly clear that a sect which can translate the New Testament like that is intellectually dishonest.”

It is highly revealing that the Watchtower Society has always resisted efforts to identify members of the New World Translation committee. The claim was they preferred to remain anonymous and humble, giving God the credit and glory for this translation. However, as former Jehovah witness David Reed notes, “an unbiased observer will quickly note that such anonymity also shields the translators from any blame for errors or distortions in their renderings. And it prevents scholars from checking their credentials.”

The Watchtower Society must have been utterly embarrassed when the names of the translators of the New World translation were made known to the public. The reason for concern was the translation committee was completely unqualified for the task. Four of the five men in the committee had no Hebrew or Greek training whatsoever (they had only a high school education)[1]. The Fifth, Fred W. Franz, claimed to know Hebrew and Greek, but upon examination under oath in a court of law in Edinburg Scotland he failed a simple Hebrew test.

In court Franz was asked if he knew Hebrew and he said yes. He said he had a command of various languages including Hebrew, Greek, Latin, Spanish, German, and French. When asked if he speaks Hebrew, he said no. He was then asked if he could translate the fourth verse of Genesis into Hebrew. His answer was NO! The fact was Franz, like the others on the committee, did not have the knowledge to translate Hebrew or Greek. The truth is Franz dropped out of the University of Cincinnati after his sophomore year and even while there, he had not studied anything related to theological issues[2].

More could be said about the errors of the New World Translation but I will stop here for now. Angela the New World Translation should be avoided at all costs.

[1] Rhodes, Ron, Reasoning from the Scriptures with the Jehovah Witnesses, Harvest House Publ. , 1993, p. 97

[2] Ibid, p. 97















{ 81 comments… add one }
  • Steve Bruecker December 14, 2014, 8:52 pm

    Thanks Skaiter for the web site recommendation. I am aware of this site and have used it occasionally as a resource. Steve

  • Kent January 5, 2015, 7:11 pm

    Howard, that is why you had the translations wrong because you based it on your “LOGICAL REASONINGS” that would fit in your ever changing doctrine I am a former JW myself, By the grace of Jesus Christ i am saved and free from your (I hate to say this) “LIES” or if not, your deceptions among yourselves. Explain to me what happened to the Holy Scriptures during the gap starting 1611 (King James Version was completed) to Aug. 1950 (NWT Released).

    You do not have the correct translation, it is one’s preconceived theology into the text, rather than allowing the text to speak for itself.

    You are driving a big number of people to Hell (which you do not believe).

  • Anthony Brooks January 26, 2015, 6:14 am

    can I say that now that I am currently dealing with one and having to compare the original Greek text to their version. I have never seen a more wrong translation… I say all JW are brainwashed.

  • nadia March 10, 2015, 8:18 am

    Hey Guys,
    I am studying the NWT, KHV, NIV.
    As I am not from a Christian background and would love to be a Christian officially, I am yet to label myself into a denomination because of these controversies.
    I am studying the bible with both Jehovah Witness and a Pentecostal connect group.

    “It was created by combining the original Hebrew name for God YHWH”
    from my studies with JW, they explain the same thing, and that they translated it to an English word, in order for us to read and say it properly.
    I mean, can we really pronounce YHWH in English?
    JW explains why they don’t like to use the word ‘Lord’, as it is a title like ‘Mrs, Dr, Mr, ‘ we shouldn’t be calling God by a title, and should call him by his name God or YHWH. I mean if you really want to get to know God, why would you call him by anything else other than his name.
    JW explanation of this makes sense to me, and I never understood why God has so many names in the bible and why we just can’t call him By his original name or just God.


    With the Trinity, I am yet undecided on what to believe,
    as I come from Muslim background, they believe God is one and the only, and there is no one equally powerful to him.
    This is why I questioned the Trinity initially as how can Jesus and the spirit be just as powerful as God? How can God be three things when he is the only one, and one God only?
    Then I come to understand, that because Jesus was Gods first creation, Jesus is god first ‘word’ or breath, therefore Jesus is from god, made from god, apart of god, is god in a way.
    Jesus is Gods representation on earth?
    no and then I still wonder,
    because at church we sing about Jesus, yet I feel we are loosing connection to god because we are singing about someone else and not about him.
    How can I get to know and love God, when we pray to Jesus, sing about Jesus etc.
    I understand god sacrificed Jesus for our sins. as a ransom for our mistakes and sins, and this is a big decision God made. To give up his first son as a ransom for our mistakes. Its powerful and overwhelming.


    Jehovah is mentioned in the KJV several times as the name of God
    Psalm 83:18
    Exodus 17:15; 6:3
    Isaiah 12:2; 26:4
    Genesis 22:14
    Judges 6:24

    can someone explain why jehovah/Yahweh (YHWH) is mentioned in KJV but God is also mentioned as ‘God’ ‘Lord’ ‘Elohim’ ‘El Shaddai’ ‘El Elyon’ ‘El Olam’

    If someone or some people can help me with understanding all this that would be fantastic ! All points of views are welcome 🙂
    sorry if there are spelling errors, I am typing fast, past 2 am and i can’t be bothered proofreading.

  • Steve Bruecker March 12, 2015, 6:46 am

    Thanks for your thoughtful questions and comments. You nicely organized your letter into 3 parts, so I will answer each of those issues.

    1. The first problem is Watchtower Organization’s assertion God or Jehovah is God’s personal name. He asked Moses to call him by the title “I AM who I AM.” The Hebrew word was “Haya” and not YHWH. Even though Haya is related to YHWH, we discover God wears many titles. Each title helps us to understand His greatness.

    The second problem is the idea we need to address God by His personal name. Other than God telling Moses to call Him “I AM who I AM,” where are we commanded to only call God by His English name Jehovah? We can address God by His many titles, just like the Hebrew Scriptures do. Why do the writers address God by many titles? According the JWs, is this wrong?

    Third, I believe the true motivation for their emphasis on the personal name of God is to discount the Trinity. The definition of the Trinity is one God subsists in 3 persons, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit; co-equal and co-eternal. By the use of a personal name it sounds silly to say, “Jimmy subsists in 3 persons Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.” So by trying to get rid of the Biblical titles used to describe God in the Scriptures, they think they can render the Trinity false. They know the title God subsisting in 3 persons is not contradictory. It is not only logically possible but is what the Bible teaches (see my teaching “Loving the Trinity” on the web site).

    Fourth, the Watchtower Organization adds Jehovah to the New Testament (New World Translation), where in the original Greek manuscripts the name Jehovah NEVER appears. This practice is a deliberate corruption of the New Testament.

    Fifth, in the New Testament to help the distinctions between Jesus and the Father, the writers used the title God for the Father and Lord for Jesus. This was especially helpful when the two persons of the Trinity, the Father and the Son, addressed each other. Wayne Grudem writes in his book Systematic Theology: “When we realize that the New Testament authors generally use the name ‘God’ (Gk. theos) to refer to God the Father and the name ‘Lord’ (Gk. kyrios) to refer to God the Son, then it is clear that there is another Trinitarian expression in 1 Corinthians 12:4–6: ‘Now there are varieties of gifts, but the same Spirit; and there are varieties of service, but the same Lord; and there are varieties of working, but it is the same God who inspires them all in every one.’ Similarly, the last verse of 2 Corinthians is Trinitarian in its expression: ‘The grace of the Lord Jesus Christ and the love of God and the fellowship of the Holy Spirit be with you all’ (2 Cor. 13:14) .” In addition we see the three persons mentioned separately in Ephesians 4:4–6; 1 Peter 1:2, and Jude 20–21.

    An example of where the Father and God are interchangeable (synonymous) can be found in Matthew and Mark.

    • Matthew 12: 50 “For whoever does the will of My Father who is in heaven, he is My brother and sister and mother.”
    • Mark 3: 35 “For whoever does the will of God, he is My brother and sister and mother.”

    2. Jesus is not a created being. This was a 3rd century heresy called Arianism and was thrown out because it contradicted the Bible. You can read more about this from my web site under the Icon called “Loving the Trinity.”

    3. In the Bible God is called by many names which describe different facets of His nature, attributes, and character. A few of the Old Testament names for God and their meanings are: El-Elyon, “The Most High God”, Jehovah-Jirah, “The Lord will provide”, Jehovah-Shalom, “The Lord of Peace”, and El-Shaddai, “The Almighty God”. Since the Hebrew Scriptures have no problem addressing God with various names, why do the JWs try to make a big deal about the name Jehovah? Above I gave good reasons why they try to discount the doctrine of the Trinity by making a big deal with one personal name. The Hebrew Scriptures don’t do this. However, they do focus on 3 primary names or titles for God, Elohim, YHWH, and Adonai.

    I hope my response is helpful. I have many articles refuting the false teachings of the Watchtower Organization. You can find them under various Icons on the home page.

    To continue to study with JWs is a dangerous practice. They have the wrong Jesus and are eternally condemned. Jesus himself said this, John 8:24 “Therefore I said to you that you will die in your sins; for unless you believe that I am He, you will die in your sins.” Jesus was asking the Jewish religious leaders to believe He is fully God (by saying I am He is referring to Exodus 3:14). If you reject the Trinity, when you die (or a JW dies) you will still be in your sins. This means you will pay the penalty for your sins yourself. Only by trusting the one true Jesus can the penalty be paid by Him and your sins forgiven.

    Steve Bruecker

  • erin April 1, 2015, 3:38 am

    Steve you did an excellent job. I work at a nursing home the Lord is guiding me to learn lots of religions. Nadia the Trinity is not overwhelming think of this mist water and ice are all types of water. God, Jesus, and Spirit are all God. also watch the capital letters written in new king James version He They Him stand for God. lower case god means made up or created by people.

    JW’s i have a question why is it there are so many things in your bible except john 1:1-3 that says one God. yours says in the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was a God… If the word was a God if there is only one which one was He? you have one translation we have many but they mean the same thing just some are easier to understand. and it isnt biblical to celebrate holidays yet i dont read in the bible that giving away watchtower notes are biblical either. God said to go and make disciples not hand out fliers. If you come to my house ill pray for you in Jesus name. Amen

  • Steve Bruecker April 2, 2015, 2:39 pm

    Thanks for the kind words. You said some good things in your response. Especially, the fact that JWs believe in more than 1 god, since they believe Jesus is a lesser god.

    However, be careful using any physical examples to explain the Trinity. The water example commits the fallacy called modalism. This is where God is one being and He appears as one mode at a time. In the OT God is in the Father mode. In the Gospels God is in the Jesus mode and after Pentecost, God is in the Holy Spirit mode. Read my series Loving the Trinity, where I give more depth as to the problems of modalism and why physical examples can never describe an all-powerful, immaterial being.


  • anthony April 21, 2015, 7:32 am

    The name Jehovah was not used until 1270 in our literature and was invented by the catholic church… he has many names so lets not get too hasty as to what God’s name really is…

  • Miranda Lights May 19, 2015, 6:39 am

    The New Worlds Translation is not accurate. The anonymous translators used the name Jehovah instead of the original form YHWH or Yahweh..I noticed at major point, its like they are forcing readersto use Jehovah..On the first hand, where did they get that name and why did they chosed that name instead of Yahweh?? I was searching recently and I found out that the name Jehovah was formed by Latin monks,, it was from the original form “YHWH” became was an error

  • garywallace August 12, 2015, 2:27 pm

    I had a older J.W. at my door today, and before he started asking, I did the asking. Who founded J.W. A- I don’t know. Q- Who translated the N.W.T. or The N.L.T. A- I don’t know. Q- John 1:1-3 reference to A God, how many god’s do you worship. A- He would not answer that question, but started to give a J.W. answer that made no sense. Q- I asked him to do the research before investing his eternity to the J.W. A- He insisted that he had done his research of the J.W. and stated that Biblical Scholars insist the N.W.T. is a legitimate translation. I have read many experts write, “This is the worst translation. This is how not to translate any written work,” Etc. I asked the man why all translations even into other languages, why is it only in the J.W. bible that it is written, “and the word was A god,” A- Because all other translations are false. Q- I asked him why is it a secret who translated their bible, and are you sure they had the language skills in Greek, Latin, Hebrew or Aramaic. A- No answer. Q- Why are there so many rewrites listed in the front of the N.W.T. A- No answer. And with that he offered me a good day and left. I believe if you know more than they know about the J.W.’s, they do not have answers.

  • Steve Bruecker August 13, 2015, 2:48 pm

    Great questions! You did an awesome job…Steve

  • sherri August 14, 2015, 7:14 am

    If JW is wrong then why did the king james put JEHOVAHS name back in its new version over 6,000 times? No one should ever take the babblings of some one who has truly not taken the time to study his bible seriously, funny how JW puts many translations side by side for one to reference yet you say we have our own words that is ignorant on your part,

  • Steve Bruecker August 16, 2015, 5:29 am

    Jehovah is a hybrid name created when you combine YHWH and Adonai. I am okay with its use in the Old Testament. However, the New World Translation forced the name Jehovah into the New Testament. There was no justification in the Greek text to do this. The KJV doesn’t do this. This is why people should stay away from the NWT.


  • Courtni Starr September 7, 2015, 1:01 pm

    Thank you Steve! I do not affliate with a church as I have developed a PERSONAL RELATIONSHIP with our Father God through Jesus Christ and communion with The Holy Spirit! The HOLY Trinity! A JW just left my house proclaiming that I was going to hell, LOL! False Prophets are EVERYWHERE in Sheeps Clothing! In ALL THINGS, TEST THE SPIRIT!

    Continued Blessings and Prosperity,

  • Carolyn January 19, 2016, 10:39 pm

    Steve, I would first like to state I am not a JW. I was born an raised Catholic. I have studied with JW, LDS and Christian groups. RE: YHWH – It is my understanding that vowels were taken out (not used in writing”. Is this true?? Is Jesus’ name in the bible completely spelled out? If it is true, which vowels are missing? How different would the pronunciation be if they were changed a bit? On another note, I’ve heard the King James Bible added back the name of God(YHWH) 7000 times. I believe anyone can give links to support “their” belief. This can be very frustrating for someone trying to attempt to learn and understand the bible. All this does is push people away.

  • Steve Bruecker January 20, 2016, 2:13 pm

    It is my understanding there were no vowels in YHWH. I believe vowels were added to help us pronounce the word as “YaHWeH.”

    The Greek transliteration for Jesus is Iēsous. No vowels are missing for the name of Jesus. The King James took the word YHWH or the English LORD and made it Jehovah in the Old Testament. This is really no big deal.

    Don’t let these issues sidetrack you from studying the Bible. What will really confuse you is studying with JWs and the LDS. They distort the Bible and hold heretical beliefs. I have spent hundreds of hours trying to help them see their errors. I have found them blinded to the truth. On my web site are multiple articles outlining how to share with Mormons or JWs.

    I hope this is helpful,


  • Anonymous March 7, 2016, 12:54 am

    Although I agree with all of this informtion and it is awesome for future reference. I think, we as Christians need to be focusing on how to help open these people’s eyes! I don’t think throwing information like this will do anything, in fact I know it doesnt. My entire immediate family is being swayed by a Jehovahs witness, showing them any information, especially coming from the Internet has done nothing but start arguments.

  • Steve Bruecker March 7, 2016, 6:00 pm

    Dear Anonymous,
    I agree with your assertion that just showing JWs information isn’t very effective. However, my site is to equip people like you. Thousands of JWs have left the organization because Christians like yourself have equipped themselves to share one on one. God can and will use good arguments to help people find the true Jesus. I know ex-JWs who found the truth and let the Watchtower Organization. The Apostle Paul used arguments all the time and so did Jesus. As Christ’s ambassadors we need to be equipped to share the truth in love.


  • Patrick April 21, 2016, 3:32 pm

    Many people have discussed in this post the KJV adding back the name God (YHWH) in newer translations. Can you comment/Explain where/why this happened? Thanks!

  • Steve Bruecker April 23, 2016, 7:07 am

    Thanks for your question. I am not sure what the big deal of the KJV using “Jehovah” in the Old Testament. The KJV translators used the English word “Jehovah” when they saw YHWH in the Hebrew text. Other translators used LORD when they saw YHWH. So what’s the big deal? Jehovah is not a Biblical word. It was created by combining the original Hebrew name for God YHWH and adonai (word used by Jews who didn’t want to say God’s name). The resulting combined word, “Jehovah” has been used for the name God by many groups but it is not found in the Bible. Nowhere do you find the word Jehovah in the original languages, Hebrew or Greek.

    Bottom line when any translation goes from Hebrew to English there is no problem with using the English word Jehovah or LORD. This is not a restoration of the name of God, it is a translation of Hebrew into English. One chooses Jehovah and the other LORD. Why is this a controversy?


  • David July 9, 2016, 10:05 am

    LORD is a mistranslation of the Hebrew YHWH (or JHVH). The Hebrew word for Lord is Adonai or adoni, not YHWH. Lord is a title meaning Master, or Sir, etc, depending on the context. YHWH is a name, the personal name of God. Exo. 6:3 “my name LORD” (as many English Bible substitute or replace the name Jehovah or Yahweh with Lord in all-caps). The original Hebrew read my name is YHWH—an actual name, the very personal name of God was used.
    While some argue over the pronunciation, many scholars, such as Nehemiah Gordon (one of the discoverers of the Dead Sea Scrolls and Karaite scholar), George Wesley Buchanan of Wesley Theological Seminary, . Gerard Gertoux: Hebrew scholar, specialist of the Tetragram, president of the Association Biblique de Recherche d’Anciens Manuscrits, and others agree that the name had 3 syllables, and was pronounced Jehovah or Yahowah or Yehovah. So I concur with the NWT translators in rendering the NAME JEHOVAH throughout the OT as an English translation of YHWH, and not being replaced or changed by the substitute LORD which takes away from the essence and meaning of the what the original was really saying–it was emphasizing the Name of God. Ps. 83:18 does not say that “men may know that he whose name alone is LORD”, but says that he whose name is Jehovah. What clarity when the translators add a name instead of a title!!! The problem of adding LORD is a major mistranslation found in many English versions of the Bible. The KJV only includes about 4 times, including Exo. 6:3 and Ps. 83:18. The same is true is the NEB and LB, which included the name only in some places in the OT. The ASV includes over 5,000 times, translating YHWH as Jehovah through out it’s NT. The same is true with the Darby, Young’s Literal, New Simplified, Voice in the Wilderness, Recovery Version, and the Jay P. Green Interlinear translations–all include a correct rendering of YHWH as a name, Jehovah, throughout. The Divine Name KJV also includes in both the OT and in the NT whenever it quotes from the OT. The Jewish NT by David Stern includes in footnotes. Darby also includes in the footnotes of some NT text.
    However, many of the major English translates exclude the name, such as the NIV, TEV, RSV, NKJV, NSRV, etc, replacing by an NON-NAME, and the title LORD, usually in caps. Some just include a brief mention of it in the footnotes on Exo. 3:14-15 or Exo. 6:3. But remove the name otherwise, as completely insignificant, replacing by LORD, a title which is not a personal name of God, and which does not in any way represent what the original Hebrew stated.
    Interestingly, the most widely distributed Bible version in Spanish include the name Jehovah – the Valera and the Version Moderna. The most widely distributed version in German, the Eberfelder (1871 and 1905 editions) include it. The most widely Portuguese version, the Almeida includes several times in the OT. And other foreign languages, including over 50 African languages, include the name in both the OT and NT.
    So you see a problem with the NWT, but I see a problem with many English Bible translation that MISTRANSLATE the Name of God, and replace with LORD several thousands times!!
    As to other Bible texts in the NT, that has already been discussed by other sources. The NWT appendices, in its various additions, have included detailed write-ups as to why they translated certain texts such as John 1:1, Acts 20:28, Romans 9:5, 1 Col 1:15-18, Titus 2:13, Gen. 1:2, and others they way they did. And it almost every case, including John 1:1, they pointed to other Bible translations or translators, mostly by Trinitarians, that agreed with the NWT rendering of those passages, either in the main text of the translations or their footnotes.
    As Bible student, I have over 35 Bible translations, in English and other foreign translations, and based on my extensive study and comparison of different Bible versions, I can affirm that the NWT is a faithful translation of the Bible, and is more accurate that many of the popular English versions of today. I concur with Jason David BeDuhn, associate professor of religious studies, who wrote regarding the NWT NT: “The NW [New World Translation] emerges as the most accurate of the translations compared.” Although the general public and many Bible scholars assume that the differences in the New World Translation are the result of religious bias on the part of its translators, BeDuhn stated: “Most of the differences are due to the greater accuracy of the NW as a literal, conservative translation of the original expressions of the New Testament writers.”—Truth in Translation, pages 163, 165.
    And although he felt that the NWT had both peculiarities and excellences, Robert M. McCoy concluded his review of it by stating: “The translation of the New Testament is evidence of the presence in the movement [Jehovah’s Witnesses] of scholars qualified to deal intelligently with the many problems of Biblical translation.”—Andover Newton Quarterly, January 1963, page 31. Regarding the OT part, I agree with Professor Benjamin Kedar, a Hebrew scholar in Israel, said in 1989: “In my linguistic research in connection with the Hebrew Bible and translations, I often refer to the English edition of what is known as the New World Translation. In so doing, I find my feeling repeatedly confirmed that this work reflects an honest endeavor to achieve an understanding of the text that is as accurate as possible.”

  • David July 9, 2016, 10:16 am

    Just a correction from my above comments regarding the ASV. I wrote:
    “The ASV includes over it 5,000 times, translating YHWH as Jehovah through out it’s NT.” Instead of NT, I intended to write OT.

  • D.E.T. July 14, 2016, 6:17 pm

    “Second, Jehovah is not a Biblical word. It was created by combining the original Hebrew name for God YHWH and adonai (word used by Jews who didn’t want to say God’s name). The resulting combined word, “Jehovah” has been used for the name God by many groups but it is not found in the Bible. Nowhere do you find the word Jehovah in the original languages, Hebrew or Greek.”

    Using that logic, we shouldn’t use Jesus (which is derived from Jehovah, by the way), either. Several other prominent Old Testament (or Hebrew Bible, if you prefer) names, such as Jeremiah, Jehoshaphat, Joshua (which is actually the same name as Jesus), etc., are formed from Jehovah. Why change the spelling of Jehovah to Yahweh or replace it with LORD when the same isn’t done for names derived from it?

  • Steve Bruecker July 16, 2016, 5:19 pm

    Don’t waste your time quoting so called scholars in support of the NWT. For every “scholar” you quote there are tons who say it is a piece of junk. These men were hired by the Watchtower Organization to do the translation and didn’t have a basic understanding of the original languages. How can anyone do an accurate translation and be ignorant of Greek and Hebrew? You can use the NWT if you want but my recommendation to anyone else, don’t waste your time.

    As far as the name of God being Jehovah, this is simply false. It is YHWH and the vast majority of New Testament scholars have no problem with using the English word LORD. But for argument sake let’s place Jehovah in the Old Testament, wherever we find YHWH. What have you gained? We then can say Christians believe in the Triune Jehovah (One God subsists in 3 person Father, Son, and Holy Spirit; co-equal and co-eternal). Are you okay with saying the Triune Jehovah?

    Then the NWT attempts to place Jehovah into the New Testament. I dealt with this issue in my original document. Jehovah being added to the New Testament is a travesty and completely disqualifies the NWT.


  • Steve Bruecker July 16, 2016, 5:24 pm

    As I wrote David, I am okay with using the English word Jehovah in the Old Testament where YHWH appears in the Hebrew text. By the same logic I have no problem using the English name Jesus wherever the transliterated Greek work “Iēsous” appears.


  • Brad August 9, 2016, 12:24 am

    Hello everyone, this is a very interesting topic for me as i was at one stage an Unbaptized Publisher with the JWs, i used to go out on the door to door work telling others of an impending doom. I took the NWT Bible for what it was, the true inspired word of God. It has been only recently that i have a lot of time to restudy the Bible and the doctrines of the JWs organization, i took it as an attack on the their Bible if someone said to me that it wasn’t correct. But lately i have been researching everything they told me using their Interlinear, Diaglot and other resources available out there n the net. Up till 1985 all their INterlinears were of the true translation, then they started to change the meanings to match their own teachings, you can see this as the newer books omit everything they taught re translation prior to this, I asked why, i started to read sites and listen to those who used to be Elders and Bethalites that found out the same thing. I have now had to start all over again but with trying to not think about my indoctrination in to their beliefs that has messed me up a little. Trying to read the Bible and not the Organization so to speak, i am finding ot so confusing now to accept the trinity as i have been shown to not believe it, like who was talking to Jesus as his Baptism, Jesus was the first born of all creation. Jesus saying that gis father was greater than he, he does the will of his father, i know the argument that while ghe was on Earth he was for a time lower than the Angels, i have read for weeks different views from other religions and not the WTBTS views. Is Jesus God? AAAAAAARGGGG thinking about all this now hurts lol…..I have been swayed to believe now after reading stuff from JWSurvey and JWFacts 4Jefovah and all these other things that hat i have been taught is not the full truth and doing my research nd learning a little about Hebrew and Greek i can see for myself where they have made the changes to manipulate the scriptures to their own making. It makes me angry..I got for myself the Greys Interlinear Bible and in regards to John 1:1it stated the at the end of the scripture that the word was with (THE) God… So do i worship Jesus? Jehovah or both grrrrr it is so confusing for me now…..
    Anyway the NWT was and has a lot of influence with Wescott and Hort, well they were spiritualists and spoke to demons so now this is worrying me a little now to as they started the ghost guilds movements and most of their reasoning was to manipulate their ideas into the scriptures to support a one world government world order

  • Steve Bruecker August 16, 2016, 10:38 am

    Thanks for writing and sharing how you are trying to understand the truth of the doctrine of the Trinity. I will email you to interact with you privately.


  • Clay August 24, 2016, 3:11 pm


    I have recently been introduced to the NWT by a visiting JW. I was unfamiliar with the JW religion until I started visiting with this person, and since visiting with him and studying some of the differences in the NWT translation and the NWT, I am concerned for what he has been taught by the JW’s.

    I was first introduced to God’s Word as a young child via the KJV. I have compared many versions and always find myself coming back to the KJV. I am not comfortable with the many versions that came about at later dates that change, add to, and omit from what I hold to believe is still the purest translation available, even though I would recommend to a new reader to become familiar with some of the archaic language (words) that are no longer used in today’s English. An example would be the word “ye”, which I am sure you know is the plural form of “you”.

    Okay, back to the JW and his adament denial that God, Jesus, and the Holy Ghost are one in the same. All I would like to add to the above conversations is that there are too many references made which indicate that these three are one, and I take great exception to the fact that in 1 John 5:7 the NWT stops short of rendering that the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost are one, by obvious omission. Since reading some of the comments above, I have now learned of another change that I find absurd, and that is what you and some of the other commentators state is rendered at John 1:1 about the Word being “a God”…oh well.

    What I stated to my JW visitor, and will state here that my faith in what the Word of God states is simply that; faith. I do not presume to understand how there are three separate entities that are “one”. No more than I understand that when a male and female join together they become “one flesh”. All I know is that God says that is the way it is, and I accept these facts based on faith, and faith alone. Bottom line, I refuse to attempt to analyze the mind and Word of God through the use of “human logic” nor the “wisdom of man”…

  • Steve Bruecker August 24, 2016, 5:59 pm

    The Bible teaches 3 things that establish the doctrine of the Trinity: 1) There is only one God, 2) The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are separate and distinct persons (Person is not physical but the ability to think rationality, communicate, and love) and finally, 3) Each person is God. The Trinity is the only solution to what the Bible teaches. This is why Jehovah’s Witnesses struggle to make sense of the scriptures and need their distorted translation to defend their beliefs.

    I will contact you via email so we can continue this conversation.

    Steve Bruecker

  • Evaana Steele September 24, 2016, 5:28 pm

    Steve, I have begun meeting with JWs, to witness to them, I have learned a lot already that is really paying off already(2nd meeting), it started b/c 1 came to my door and though I was cordial, I said I don’t believe what they believe. But, as soon as I closed the door, God told me I was supposed to witness to them!
    I wanted to express to others that we are to learn all we can and in a firm yet loving way we should be proving our case. Maybe God has sent them to save them?
    I have decided that it’s my job to present the truth and it’s His job to save them. There’s no pressure on me, but I’m to be utilized in His planting seeds.
    Just wanted to share what God told me in case He tells anyone else through here. He has guided me to lots of useful ways to speak to them. Such a privilege!!! God bless!!!

  • Steve Bruecker September 26, 2016, 11:48 am

    Evaana Steele,
    What a great letter! As followers of Jesus Christ we are all called to be ambassadors for Christ to an unbelieving world. And that includes Jehovah’s Witnesses.

    If you look at my web site I have multiple articles that will help you share with JWs. I have spent many hours with JWs sharing the truth with gentleness and respect. In some of my articles you will see the importance of forming a friendship relationship as you share the Biblical truth.

    Here are some solid articles that can help you:

    I hope that helps,
    Steve Bruecker

Leave a Comment

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.

Next post:

Previous post:

Do Objective Morals Exist?
Answering Tough Questions
Counting the Cost
Is God the Author of the Bible?
God’s Holiness and Love Wins
Ministering to Mormons in Utah
Challenging a Jehovah’s Witness
What Ever Happened to Hell?
Accurately Interpreting the Scriptures
Understanding the Christian Worldview
Accused of Partnering in Wickedness
Set Apart Christ as Lord
Sharing with Knowledge & Wisdom
Becoming a Good Ambassador for Christ
How to Persuade Others

Video Introduction

Exposing the Deceit of the Watchtower Organization
Go to Site Map
Never Miss an UPDATE Simply Enter Your Best Email