Know the basic beliefs of the Christian Worldview & Understand why they believe what they believe

Sunday, May 20, 2012

Hero of Moral Relativism: The Joker

May 10, 2010 by  
Filed under AA: Steve Bruecker, Apologetics, Ethics

Heath Ledger as the Joker
Image via Wikipedia

Today I was watching the movie “Dark Knight” and I realized the Joker was the great hero of moral relativism. Why is he the greatest example of moral relativism? It is because his only rule is there are no objective rules; he does what his heart desires. The moral relativist does what he or she wants to do; there are no universal rules. The Joker loves to blow up buildings, destroy cars, kill people slowly, and cause as much pain as possible because those things give him great pleasure. During the movie he demonstrated he didn’t have a conscience. For a person to have a guilty conscience you need rules to be broken and the Joker has no rules. This is why the Joker smiles and laughs all the time, not just because his face was cut, but because he never feels bad about murdering people.  If a moral relativist does what they thought was wrong all he has to do is change the rule.  If the Joker at one time thought murder was wrong, after his first murder, he could change his rule to murder is right and good.  Does anyone want to follow a moral system that has the Joker as their moral hero?  This is why most moral relativists love to live next to people who believe in objective moral right and wrong.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Related Articles:

Looking for something?

Or visit the Site Map

Incoming search terms for the article:

Comments

3 Responses to “Hero of Moral Relativism: The Joker”
  1. Matthew says:

    Interesting thoughts, very interesting. I suppose you could say he’s a very skewed version of a moral relativist. But I think a better example would be Batman as a moral relativist. Batman at one time would see spying on people as “wrong”, but if it can help him to catch the Joker, then it’s right in the context of that situation. And in near the beginning of “Batman Begins”, he saw letting Ra’s Al Ghul fall to his death as wrong, but at the end he clearly did not when he told Ra’s, “I’m not gonna kill you, but I don’t have to save you.” I think that’s why Batman is a better example of moral relativism: because he DOES have morals, but they do change at times depending on the context. Whereas the Joker has NO morals whatsoever, which doesn’t really strike me as moral relativism. I’d say he’s completely AMORAL instead, meaning he doesn’t believe in any sort of moral code. He believes nothing is right or wrong, that morals are silly little buzzwords and codes which ultimately mean nothing. A moral relativist could not really agree because they believe that when they do something that would normally be considered “wrong” they are at least doing it for a good purpose within the context of the situation. If we’re to compare comic book villains, I’d say LEX LUTHOR is the king of moral relativism. He does a lot of good for the world but also does so much evil. Whenever he does an evil act, he justifies it in his head somehow as “doing what’s right for humanity”. So I see Lex as an evil version of Bruce Wayne in a way, whereas Bruce still has lines he will not cross despite his moral relativism. The Joker would mock both of them trying to analyze the ends justifying the means for what’s best for the world and ask them, “Do you really believe you’re making a difference?” Then he’d laugh at them spitefully.

  2. Steve says:

    Matthew,
    Thanks for your interesting reply. I still contend the Joker is a strong candidate for the hero of moral relativism. He is the ultimate sociopath; doing whatever he wants. I don’t believe any person can achieve amoral status; they cannot be neutral. The Joker has a moral basis; whatever gives him pleasure is his morality. Some call this “pleasure as ethics.” For the Joker he tries to derive pleasure from doing evil to others and incurring personal pain. He doesn’t want Batman dead because alive he makes all the evil he does increasingly pleasurable. What the Joker lacks is any objective standard for morality, which by definition qualifies him as a moral relativist. His decisions are based on what gives him the most personal pleasure, which I believe makes him the ultimate hero of moral relativism.

    I enjoyed your additional examples of moral relativists. An entire book could be written on the morality of comic books.

  3. ALEX says:

    Moral relativism also relates to religions, tribes and nations, not just individuals.

Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!